[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs documentation is bad
|
From: |
Barry Fishman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Emacs documentation is bad |
|
Date: |
Sun, 09 Sep 2018 18:10:59 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) |
On 2018-09-09 17:39:54 -04, Noam Postavsky wrote:
> On 9 September 2018 at 17:33, Barry Fishman <barry@ecubist.org> wrote:
>
>> If Scheme semantics are that important to you, you could move your project to
>> a Scheme environment, maybe MIT Scheme and Erwin, if you want a Scheme
>> based Emacs. Or help with the project implementing Guile Emacs.
>
> AFAIK, Guile Emacs doesn't change the semantics of Emacs Lisp, it just
> reimplements the same semantics using the Guile VM bytecode
> interpreter.
My understanding that a Guile implementation of Emacs is not just to use
E-Lisp, but to allow writing Emacs extensions in any language Guile
supports, in particular Scheme.
This is discussed in the Emacs Wiki page:
https://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/GuileEmacs
--
Barry Fishman
Message not available