[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: (interactive) call or form?
|
From: |
Marcin Borkowski |
|
Subject: |
Re: (interactive) call or form? |
|
Date: |
Mon, 09 Apr 2018 21:48:28 +0200 |
|
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.1.0; emacs 27.0.50 |
On 2018-04-09, at 16:39, Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> wrote:
> Emanuel Berg <moasen@zoho.com> writes:
>
>> > So you think people understand "special form"
>> > but don't understand "form"?
>>
>> In a way, yes, because "special form" sounds like something you don't
>> understand, while "form" sounds like something you would understand,
>> only you don't (probably), so it is more confusing.
>
> These words name different things anyway: the first one is about the
> binding of the function cell of the symbol `interactive', the other
> names the whole s-exp "(interactive ...)". AFAIU the OP wanted a
> description of the latter.
I guess you're right. Thanks!
--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl