[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: killing the result of isearch
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: killing the result of isearch |
Date: |
Tue, 7 Nov 2017 14:10:32 -0800 (PST) |
> Let's change "One-two, Buckle my shoe" to something else.
> C-s one-two, buckle my shoe C-r RET C-s C-s RET C-x C-x C-w
(You don't need the `C-x C-x' here, unless you want to
see highlighted what `C-w' will delete.)
> Personally I always bind C-s to isearch-forward-regexp instead of
> leaving it at isearch-forward. Regular expressions are so much more
> powerful and useful.
OK, but what you show above does not work, in general,
for regexps. Regexp search forward and backward do not
find the same text, generally.
If you regexp-search for the same text, `one-two,
buckle my shoe', no problem. But if you use `o.*oe'
you'll be in trouble.
- RE: killing the result of isearch, (continued)
- RE: killing the result of isearch, Drew Adams, 2017/11/07
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Tomas Nordin, 2017/11/08
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/11/08
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Emanuel Berg, 2017/11/08
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Tomas Nordin, 2017/11/09
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/11/10
- RE: killing the result of isearch, Drew Adams, 2017/11/10
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Marcin Borkowski, 2017/11/07
- RE: killing the result of isearch, Drew Adams, 2017/11/07
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Bob Proulx, 2017/11/07
- RE: killing the result of isearch,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Bob Proulx, 2017/11/07
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/11/07
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Bob Proulx, 2017/11/07
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Jean-Christophe Helary, 2017/11/08
- Re: killing the result of isearch, Bob Proulx, 2017/11/08
Re: killing the result of isearch, Stefan Monnier, 2017/11/07