Re: Build Emacs without Lisp?

[Klaus Schilling]

Jeffrey Walton <noloader@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>> Taking your subject line literally (ie not the usual way its done today
>> to suggest emacs = gnu-emacs)
>> have you seen this list of 'smaller' emacsen: 
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emacs#Various_Emacs_editors
>
> Thanks, that's a good point. I'm so used to emacs, I grab it with no thought.
>
> Maybe an emacs knock-off is a better solution until we get a working
> debugger to investigate the issue.

The GNU Zile project might be useful in that context. It includes a
superficial lookalike with very low memory usage.

Klaus Schilling