[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?
From: |
Bob Proulx |
Subject: |
Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired? |
Date: |
Mon, 20 Jun 2016 17:07:06 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) |
Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> Bob Proulx wrote:
> > As such these two projects have a different design vision. As far as
> > I can tell this is the difference. If a person is coming from a Unix
> > background and likes it then Cygwin provides a more Unix like
> > environment. If a person is coming from a Microsoft background and
> > likes it then MinGW provides a more Microsoft like environment.
> >
> > True? False? I don't know.
>
> Both true and false. The issue here is not whether to prefer Cygwin
> over MinGW. The issue is whether it is a good idea to have a MinGW
> build of Emacs use Cygwin ls to produce directory listings on which
> the MinGW built Emacs will have to operate. IOW, the issue is mixing
> Cygwin and MinGW programs in the same workflow, when it is known that
> the way each one represents Posix access bits is radically different.
I think your point here is very reasonable. :-)
Bob
- Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, Davin Pearson, 2016/06/17
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, John Mastro, 2016/06/17
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/18
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, John Mastro, 2016/06/18
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/18
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, Bob Proulx, 2016/06/19
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/19
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, John Mastro, 2016/06/20
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/20
- Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?,
Bob Proulx <=
Re: Where has the rwxr-xr-x gone from dired?, Eli Zaretskii, 2016/06/18