[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defining functions within functions?
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: Defining functions within functions? |
Date: |
Tue, 24 May 2016 23:46:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4 (gnu/linux) |
Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
> For now, I decided to go with lambdas, but
> also to sprinkle the code with comments.
> Old-fashioned, but should do the jon in
> my case.
... why is that old-fashioned?
It is much better to put everything in a new
file, and have all it all defuns on the
same level.
If you have comments, you are halfway there as
you can put the comments into docstrings!
Actually the `checkdoc-current-buffer'
I mentioned in another thread will tell you to
do that, turn the comment into a docstring, if
it suspects the comment serves the same purpose
as would a docstring.
Docstrings are better because they are
integrated in the help and interface
documentation system!
--
underground experts united .... http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
Emacs Gnus Blogomatic ......... http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573/blogomatic
- so far: 40 Blogomatic articles -