Re: `looking-back' strange warning

[Andreas Röhler]

Am 01.10.2015 um 20:59 schrieb Dmitry Gutov:
> On 10/01/2015 09:24 PM, Andreas Röhler wrote:
>
> > BTW the intendet use case doesn't exist - as Tassilo found out.
>
> I'm unconvinced, but I don't have the time to investigate it now.
>
> If `looking-back' doesn't work as intended, or LIMIT doesn't help, you 
> or he should file a bug with details.

The short-coming is well-known and was answered years ago like "didn't 
have time yet to implement backward-moves according to forward-ones". 
Might also be is a comment in source like that.

WRT to limit: it is unrelated to the slowness.

Depending from the task it might be useful - keeping it optional seems TRT.