[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: When do you prefer frames instead of windows?
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: When do you prefer frames instead of windows? |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Nov 2014 07:39:12 -0800 (PST) |
> > So I use a single emacs frame in full screen
> > mode, and workgroups2 to manage several groups of windows
>
> This. Workgroups is an outstanding extension. It seems to me that,
> for all the presumed uses of frames for managing multiple groups
> of windows, workgroups can do it better,
OK, that's one point.
> providing out of the box most of what this thread is seeking
> from frames.
But that's a different point.
I'm not familiar with workgroups2, but "managing multiple groups
of [Emacs] windows" is not "most of what this thread is seeking
from frames."
IOW, so far, it sounds like workgroups2 might be an argument
*not* to use Emacs windows instead of frames. But so far, it
does not sound like an argument for using workgroups2 (or
using Emacs windows) instead of frames.
Message not available
Re: When do you prefer frames instead of windows?, Bob Proulx, 2014/11/25
Re: When do you prefer frames instead of windows?, Ken Goldman, 2014/11/26
Re: When do you prefer frames instead of windows?, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2014/11/27