[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs)
From: |
Emanuel Berg |
Subject: |
Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs) |
Date: |
Fri, 30 May 2014 00:58:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) |
James Freer <jessejazza3.uk@gmail.com> writes:
> Wordstar may have 'died' long ago but it had the most
> efficient keybindings of any editor/word processor -
> experts tell me! Writers still use it. Word Perfect
> and Word replaced it as you say - they were simpler
> to learn.
What were the WS keybindings characteristics and what
makes them superior in your mind?
And what do you mean by "writers" - do you mean writers
of novels, plays, etc.? Or do you mean writers like you
and me, right now?
--
underground experts united:
http://user.it.uu.se/~embe8573
- editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), (continued)
- editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/28
- Re: editor and word processor history, Glyn Millington, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), James Freer, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history, Haines Brown, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Allan Streib, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Robert Thorpe, 2014/05/29
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Bob Proulx, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Rusi, 2014/05/30
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs),
Emanuel Berg <=
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), James Freer, 2014/05/30
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/30
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), James Freer, 2014/05/30
- Message not available
- From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Barry Margolin, 2014/05/31
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Sharon Kimble, 2014/05/31
- Message not available
- Re: From: Sharon Kimble, Subject: Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/31
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history (was: Re: RTF for emacs), Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29
- Message not available
- Re: editor and word processor history, Emanuel Berg, 2014/05/29