[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: obarray
From: |
Michael Heerdegen |
Subject: |
Re: obarray |
Date: |
Sun, 15 Dec 2013 07:15:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Emanuel Berg <embe8573@student.uu.se> writes:
> Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de> writes:
>
> > The last line easier without cl'ish setf:
> >
> > (set uninterned-symbol 'bar)
>
> CL or not, I get the same situation (what I can see),
> the symbol *does* end up in obarray, and that second
> part (setf or set) - what is that supposed to do? What
> I can see it doesn't change the value,
(symbol-value uninterned-symbol)
==> bar
Note that we are not speaking about the symbol uninterned-symbol, which
is in obarray, but about its value, which is another symbol that is not
in obarray, has name "foo", and now a value of bar. We made that
uninterned symbol the value of another interned symbol because we can't
refer to an uninterned symbol directly in a program.
> either with my defun or describe-variable (which I trust more), I get
> the argument to make-symbol.
Sorry, I didn't follow this part.
Regards,
Michael.
- Re: obarray, (continued)
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/16
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/16
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/16
- Re: obarray, Barry Margolin, 2013/12/17
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/17
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Michael Heerdegen, 2013/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray,
Michael Heerdegen <=
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
- Message not available
- Re: obarray, Barry Margolin, 2013/12/15
- Re: obarray, Emanuel Berg, 2013/12/15
Re: obarray, jack-mac, 2013/12/17