[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?
From: |
Rustom Mody |
Subject: |
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Aug 2013 18:44:51 -0700 (PDT) |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Tuesday, August 27, 2013 4:13:20 AM UTC+5:30, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto >
> At least as a LaTeX editor, IDE for C++,
> Python, Javascript and Java, and general text editor.
The same question could be asked for all the above, viz, C++, Python, Java,
Latex, general text editing... [Javascript is the obvious exception]
Yeah seriously, in the last month Ive been asked/told about 4 times "... isnt
programming as such passe??..."
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge Peixoto de Morais Neto, 2013/08/29
Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge, 2013/08/29
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/29
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Eli Zaretskii, 2013/08/30
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Jorge, 2013/08/30
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?,
Rustom Mody <=
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/27
Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Marc Weber, 2013/08/27
Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/27
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Marc Weber, 2013/08/27
- Message not available
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Rustom Mody, 2013/08/28
- Re: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/28
Message not availableRe: Is Emacs very alive, active and improving?, Emanuel Berg, 2013/08/28