|
From: | Stefan Monnier |
Subject: | Re: Style Issues in Lisp and Scheme programming, setq versus let ... and onion structure with multiple cores or eyes or kernels Re: string to list or string to array |
Date: | Wed, 24 Oct 2012 11:03:28 -0400 |
User-agent: | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
> btw, Lisp's prefix notation, (f x y z) is more expressive and > convenient for expressing currying (((f x) y) z) than f(x y z). With all due respect to Lisp, that's not true. Curried calls in the non-Lisp syntax are simply "f(x)(y)(z)" or even better "f x y z". Stefan
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |