[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: IDE versus emacs
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: IDE versus emacs |
Date: |
Thu, 04 Oct 2012 19:26:13 +0200 |
> Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 12:48:49 -0400
> From: Wally Lepore <wallylepore@gmail.com>
>
> So far I have learned that the following combination of tools for
> windows win32 platform x32 (i.e.win2k, winXP and win7) could be a
> start but perhaps some are not needed.
>
> Text Editor: emacs
> GUI Builder: GTK+2 or Glade
> Compiler: MinGW
> Debugger: ?
GDB, of course, available for download from the MinGW site. Nothing
else will debug GCC-generated programs as efficiently as GDB does.
Emacs includes a front end for it, as I'm sure you know.
> Linker: ?
GNU Binutils, from MinGW. You have no other choices if your compiler
is GCC.
> Standard "C" Library: ?
Windows comes with one already, so you don't need anything. MinGW
runtime and headers come with a small set of additional functions that
are missing or grossly misfeatured in the MS-provided standard library
that is part of Windows.
Be sure to download also these important tools:
ID-Utils
Findutils
Make
Grep
and learn about etags and ebrowse that come with Emacs (if you didn't
know about them already).
> I also located the links below for GNU tools for windows (not sure if
> I need any of these).
> http://gnuwin32.sourceforge.net/packages.html
> http://www.gnutoolchains.com/
These are old and unmaintained. Some of them are even badly broken.
I recommend to look on the MinGW site first, and then here:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ezwinports/files/
- IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Eli Zaretskii, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Brandon Betances, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Wally Lepore, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Óscar Fuentes, 2012/10/04
- Re: IDE versus emacs, Jai Dayal, 2012/10/04