[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:33:53 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> | (prefer-coding-system 'windows-1252)
> No, those files should not be edited using a windows code page, they are
> supposed to be latin-1.
Are you saying that this char was an error? If not, then it does seem
like you want to use windows-1252 (which is a perfectly normal
coding-system, tho it happens to be a lot more common for a valid utf-8
file to also be a valid windows-1252 file, so it's more difficult for
Emacs to automatically choose the right coding-system unless you tell it
that you prefer utf-8 more than 1252).
Stefan
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, (continued)
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09