[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs-w3m question
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
Subject: |
Re: emacs-w3m question |
Date: |
Mon, 3 Nov 2008 12:25:25 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.12 on GNU/Linux |
in perhaps early 1990s, some keyboards do not have the arrow keys, or
that some applications (in particular, terminal applications) do not
necessarily support physical arrow keys by default.
Today, i think more than 99.999% keyboards and applications support
the physical arrows keys by default. The availablity of arrow keys i
think is pretty much standard by mid 1990s, and their support in
applications including term emulators is probably standard by 2000.
At work, I still have oldies that still do not support these
keys. What's more, directional keys are one of the dumbest
addition one could have thought off (in my opinion). The same
apply for numerical keypad: what are they useful for exactly ? Is
it that hard to press shift+& (for the azerty keyboard) to get a
1 ? Or press C-b to move point left ? I do not think so.
The real reason that comes to mind is lazyness. People do not
want to (take time to) learn how to do things, they want to go
fast (even if they go fast wrongly). Keyboard (or typing more
generally) is just an example, there are so many other applying
here...
End of digression for me.
Xavier
--
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org
Re: emacs-w3m question,
Xavier Maillard <=
Re: emacs-w3m question, Xah, 2008/11/03