[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
eshell pipelines (Was: Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding)
From: |
David Hansen |
Subject: |
eshell pipelines (Was: Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding) |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Aug 2008 14:21:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
[For emacs-devel:
In gnu.emacs.help there is a discussion about some little eshell,
eshell/ls bug. Processes in a pipeline get a TTY for IO (via
`start-process'). Quite some programs behave different whether they
have a TTY or not.
The other thing is that eshell/ls does not output one file per line
when in a pipeline (as the usual GNU ls does).]
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 13:21:00 +0200 Thierry Volpiatto wrote:
> As Lennart said you call ls with -1 arg or you can always call ls with
> this arg setting it like that:
>
> ,----
> | (setq eshell-ls-initial-args '(-1))
> `----
>
> now when you call for example "ls | wc -l" , you will have the
> good number of lines.
>
> It would be cool to have a function to call in some hook to call ls -1
> only if there is a "|" after ls, this function do that but i need a hook
> to call it:
>
> ,----
> | (defun eshell-set-ls ()
> | (let ((com-line
> | (eshell-parse-arguments (re-search-backward "ls")
> (line-end-position))))
> | (if (equal (nth 1 com-line) '(eshell-operator "|"))
> | (setq eshell-ls-initial-args '(-1))
> | (setq eshell-ls-initial-args nil))))
> `----
Try the attached patch. It
* Starts subprocesses in a (eshell) pipeline using a pipe and not a TTY
(this should also give some performance boost).
* Appends "-1" to eshell/ls if ls is called in a pipeline.
At the time it's feature freeze for Emacs so it will probably take some
time to make it in there. Cc: anyways, maybe some old timer can approve
the two lines.
David
*** em-ls.el.~1.33.~ 2008-06-07 20:14:50.000000000 +0200
--- em-ls.el 2008-08-13 14:05:43.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 299,304 ****
--- 299,306 ----
(let ((insert-func 'eshell-buffered-print)
(error-func 'eshell-error)
(flush-func 'eshell-flush))
+ ;; In pipelines use the -1 switch.
+ (and eshell-in-pipeline-p (push "-1" args))
(eshell-do-ls args)))
(put 'eshell/ls 'eshell-no-numeric-conversions t)
*** esh-proc.el.~1.21.~ 2008-05-12 20:30:41.000000000 +0200
--- esh-proc.el 2008-08-13 14:20:38.000000000 +0200
***************
*** 249,260 ****
proc decoding encoding changed)
(cond
((fboundp 'start-process)
! (setq proc
! (apply 'start-process
! (file-name-nondirectory command) nil
! ;; `start-process' can't deal with relative
! ;; filenames
! (append (list (expand-file-name command)) args)))
(eshell-record-process-object proc)
(set-process-buffer proc (current-buffer))
(if (eshell-interactive-output-p)
--- 249,262 ----
proc decoding encoding changed)
(cond
((fboundp 'start-process)
! ;; Don't use a TTY for processes in a pipeline.
! (let ((process-connection-type (not eshell-in-pipeline-p)))
! (setq proc
! (apply 'start-process
! (file-name-nondirectory command) nil
! ;; `start-process' can't deal with relative
! ;; filenames
! (append (list (expand-file-name command)) args))))
(eshell-record-process-object proc)
(set-process-buffer proc (current-buffer))
(if (eshell-interactive-output-p)
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Tim X, 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/12
- Message not available
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Chris F.A. Johnson, 2008/08/12
- Message not available
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Tim X, 2008/08/13
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Thierry Volpiatto, 2008/08/13
- eshell pipelines (Was: Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding),
David Hansen <=
- Re: eshell pipelines, Thierry Volpiatto, 2008/08/13
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, ken, 2008/08/13
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/12
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, David Hansen, 2008/08/12
- Message not available
- Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Rupert Swarbrick, 2008/08/12
Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/08/11
Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Tim X, 2008/08/12
Re: Optimal emacs shell for coding, Mike Treseler, 2008/08/11