Re: EmacsW32 invocation options

[Lennart Borgman (gmail)]

Juanma Barranquero wrote:
> On 5/2/07, Lennart Borgman (gmail) <lennart.borgman@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Juanma Barranquero wrote:
>
> > And so is sound reasoning without personal attachs.
>
> Rest assured I haven't attacked you.
>
> You think that explaining the feeling I get from your webpage is an
> attack. It's not. I cannot read your mind, but I have no trouble
> whatsoever reading mine.

Reading ones own mind is also about understanding where the feelings 
come from. And about acting/reacting/contemplating.

Maybe you think I am saying to much above but I really have found some 
of your comments strange.


> I think that saying that the Emacs developers did not take the time to
> discuss rationally or in deep what you wanted to do, or asking again
> and again to people who disagrees with you whether they have read your
> webpages, or messages in a discussion thread, instead of assuming that
> they *have* read it and just *do* disagree... that seems like a
> personal attack to me, yes.

I am not the one who brings up this discussion. I would prefer to be 
silent if I did not find the comments destructive.