[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?
From: |
Mathias Dahl |
Subject: |
Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why? |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Dec 2005 10:21:18 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (windows-nt) |
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> There are several ways you can do this. You can of course use the arrow
> keys, but it's generally more efficient in the long run to keep your
> hands in the standard position and use the commands C-p, C-b, C-f, and
> C-n. These characters are equivalent to the four arrow keys, like this:
How about
There are several ways you can do this. You can use the arrow
keys or you can use C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n. Generally, many find
the latter more efficient in the long run because it keeps your
hands in the standard position. These characters are equivalent
to the four arrow keys like this:
Thus avoiding expressions like "but it is generally more..." which
forces an opinion in the user. IMHO, of course. :)
/Mathias
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, (continued)
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Tim Johnson, 2005/12/12
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Ralf Angeli, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Tim Johnson, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/13
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Björn Lindström, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, don provan, 2005/12/17
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/19
- Message not available
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Stefan Monnier, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?,
Mathias Dahl <=
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Per Abrahamsen, 2005/12/15
- RE: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Drew Adams, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Mathias Dahl, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Xavier Maillard, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Lennart Borgman, 2005/12/15
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Richard M. Stallman, 2005/12/16
- Re: C-p, C-b, C-f, and C-n... why?, Eli Zaretskii, 2005/12/15