[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Defadvice use
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: Defadvice use |
Date: |
Mon, 18 Apr 2005 19:20:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> So, I question now: Do you recommend that my patch change this (one
> could use a variable containing the name of a function...)?
I'm not sure I understand the question.
I'd recommend you write a sample patch and send it to emacs-devel@gnu.org,
along with an explanation of why you think it's necessary (including your
particular use). It'll be debated and will require revisions anyway, so no
need to make it perfect.
Rather than dired-read-shell-command I'd argue Emacs should provide
a read-shell-command, which could be used at many places.
The pcomplete library already provides most of the code for that.
Stefan
- Re: Mis-features of let, (continued)
- Re: Mis-features of let, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/04/19
- Re: Mis-features of let, David Kastrup, 2005/04/19
- Re: Mis-features of let, rgb, 2005/04/19
- Re: Mis-features of let, David Kastrup, 2005/04/20
- Re: Mis-features of let, Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/20
- Re: Mis-features of let, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/04/20
- Re: Mis-features of let, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2005/04/19
- Re: Defadvice use, Barry Margolin, 2005/04/19
Re: Defadvice use, Stefan Monnier, 2005/04/18
Re: Defadvice use, Kevin Rodgers, 2005/04/18