[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What's the state of the art for mail?
From: |
martin |
Subject: |
Re: What's the state of the art for mail? |
Date: |
Tue, 29 Jun 2004 17:36:51 -0000 |
User-agent: |
Emacs Gnus |
"JF" == Joe Fineman <jcf@TheWorld.com> writes:
JF> Date: 09 Jun 2004 18:37:58 -0400
JF>
JF> Mike Irwin <mdi@pobox.com> writes:
JF>
>> There's nothing better than Gnus.
JF>
JF> Switching from nn to Gnus improved my quality of life greatly.
JF> However, I consider it a serious defect that it does not allow one to
JF> examine mail (at least the sender & subject) before downloading it.
hi,
there is imap support by the nnimap backend.
martin
JF> --
JF> --- Joe Fineman jcf@TheWorld.com
JF>
JF> ||: Deficient contact with reality is called mania. Excessive :||
JF> ||: contact with reality is called depression. :||
JF>
--
martin dot fischer at boschrexroth dot de
- What's the state of the art for mail?, kj, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Mike Irwin, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Bill Wohler, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, kj, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Tassilo Horn, 2004/06/29
- Re: What's the state of the art for mail?, Xavier Maillard, 2004/06/29