[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: C-x v g going further back in time?
From: |
Benjamin Rutt |
Subject: |
Re: C-x v g going further back in time? |
Date: |
Thu, 08 Jan 2004 17:16:03 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.3.50 (usg-unix-v) |
Benjamin Rutt <brutt+news@bloomington.in.us> writes:
> I love C-x v g in a file managed by CVS, I can see exactly which user
> finalized which line of the file, and on which date. This is
> invaluable for answering the question of who to ask about different
> lines of code. However, sometimes that's not enough to find out who
> put that line of code there originally, as sometimes people make
> whitespace changes, yet C-x v g only shows the last committer of a
> line so sometimes the "whitespace changer" is not the "true author" of
> that line. Is there any way to go back in time to see who committed a
> given line earlier in time?
Since I wrote this, I see C-x v g takes a prefix argument which can
give the revision number. But I think it's useful also to be able to
go incrementally backwards and forwards revisions, interactively, from
within the *Annotate* buffer. I'll look at modifying vc*.el to
support this idea.
--
Benjamin
- C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Andrew Taylor, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?,
Benjamin Rutt <=
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/08
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/20
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/20
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/25
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/26
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
- Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Stefan Monnier, 2004/01/26
Re: C-x v g going further back in time?, Benjamin Rutt, 2004/01/11