[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region
From: |
Barry Margolin |
Subject: |
Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jul 2003 15:39:32 GMT |
In article <3F12CCE0.9090801@yahoo.com>,
Kevin Rodgers <ihs_4664@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Kai Großjohann wrote:
>
>> If transient-mark-mode is active, M-( should surround the region with
>> parens, ie do like C-w M-( C-y.
>
>How should a prefix arg be interpreted in that case? Is it ignored, or
>
>does it force the current behavior (i.e does transient-mark-mode or
>current-prefix arg have precedence)?
It seems reasonable for this change to affect only the default behavior.
If you go to the trouble to specify the number of sexp's to parenthesize,
why would you want it to ignore that?
For those of us who don't use transient-mark-mode, how about C-u M-( or M--
M-( surrounding the region?
--
Barry Margolin, barry.margolin@level3.com
Level(3), Woburn, MA
*** DON'T SEND TECHNICAL QUESTIONS DIRECTLY TO ME, post them to newsgroups.
Please DON'T copy followups to me -- I'll assume it wasn't posted to the group.
- Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Kai Großjohann, 2003/07/12
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Jesper Harder, 2003/07/12
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Eric Hanchrow, 2003/07/12
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Olivier Aumage, 2003/07/13
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Kevin Rodgers, 2003/07/14
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region,
Barry Margolin <=
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Stefan Monnier, 2003/07/14
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Kai Großjohann, 2003/07/14
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Barry Margolin, 2003/07/14
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Kai Großjohann, 2003/07/15
- Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Stefan Monnier, 2003/07/15
Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Sandip Chitale, 2003/07/14
Re: Crazy idea for M-(: surround region, Ilya Zakharevich, 2003/07/15