help-gnu-emacs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Emacs 21.3.50 on OS X 10.2.2


From: Chris Waterson
Subject: Re: Emacs 21.3.50 on OS X 10.2.2
Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2002 18:45:40 -0800
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; PPC Mac OS X; en-US; rv:1.2b) Gecko/20021016

Hugo Wolf wrote:

In article , Gavin
White wrote:

>I updated Jaguar to 10.2.2 today, and now Emacs won't load.


Yep, looks like you'll have to rebuild.  I just went through that -
see posts on comp.sys.mac.system.  I wasn't expecting this in a minor
os upgrade (10.2.1->10.2.2).  Works fine after rebuilding though.

Hmm. I'm not able to rebuild, either. The build "bootstrap-emacs" that I have segfaults, so I can't compile any of the elisp files. Unfortunately, the crash is somewhere in dyld:

/usr/local/src/emacs/2002-11-01/emacs$ gdb src/bootstrap-emacs
[...]
(gdb) run [...] Program received signal EXC_BAD_ACCESS, Could not access memory. 0x8fe0d53c in __dyld_lookup_symbol () (gdb) bt #0 0x8fe0d53c in __dyld_lookup_symbol () #1 0x8fe0baac in __dyld_resolve_undefineds () #2 0x8fe10614 in __dyld_link_in_need_modules () #3 0x8fe014e4 in __dyld__dyld_init ()
(gdb)

This is making me believe that "dump-emacs" in loadup.el is just generating a garbage binary.

I'm getting some duplicate symbol errors when linking temacs (which will itself run fine):

ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _PC terminfo.o definition of _PC in section (__DATA,__common) /usr/lib/libncurses.dylib(lib_tputs.o) definition of _PC ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _BC terminfo.o definition of _BC in section (__DATA,__common) /usr/lib/libncurses.dylib(lib_termcap.o) definition of _BC ld: warning multiple definitions of symbol _UP terminfo.o definition of _UP in section (__DATA,__common) /usr/lib/libncurses.dylib(lib_termcap.o) definition of _UP

#ifdef'ing these MAC_OSX in terminfo.c has no effect, sadly.

The emacs-os/x FAQ mentions bad ju-ju related to fink, so I guess my next trick will be uninstalling that... :-(

Help!

thanks,
chris



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]