[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced
From: |
SpaceRider |
Subject: |
Re: [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced |
Date: |
Thu, 9 Oct 2008 18:02:48 +0400 |
Great, thank you (both) for the hints
I think I recognise. I must try, now.
Andrew Makhorin wrote:
>
>> // s.t. supply{i in I}: sum{j in J} x[i,j] = a[i];
>> s.t. supply{i in I}: sum{j in J} x[i,j] = a[i]; // process all offer
>
>> s.t. demand{j in J}: sum{i in I} x[i,j] >= b[j];
>
>> Now, I need a additional comparison, but not a range from to
>> sum{i in I} x[i,j] >= b[j] OR sum{i in I} x[i,j] = 0
>
>> How I have to write the syntax?
>> Is it still a LP-Problem?
>
> No, it is mip due to disjunctive constraint.
>
> See example model ftcp.mod, included in the glpk distribution.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Help-glpk mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/help-glpk
>
>
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/Transport-Problem-advanced-tp19887773p19898314.html
Sent from the Gnu - GLPK - Help mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
- [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced, SpaceRider, 2008/10/08
- Re: [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced, Bruno Rosell i Gui, 2008/10/09
- Re: [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced,
SpaceRider <=
- Re: [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced, SpaceRider, 2008/10/10
- Re: [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced, SpaceRider, 2008/10/13
- Re: [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced, SpaceRider, 2008/10/14
- Re: [Help-glpk] Transport Problem advanced, SpaceRider, 2008/10/19