[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

43-hour ack-message delay?

From: Jim Meyering
Subject: 43-hour ack-message delay?
Date: Tue, 01 May 2012 11:34:52 +0200


Just a heads up that while I filed four bugs Saturday evening, it took
43 hours for the ack email messages (one below) to reach me.
At first I doubted the messages had been received, but
checking the web interface, I found that they had indeed been
processed enough to be assigned bug numbers.

  From address@hidden  Mon Apr 30 19:24:41 2012
  Return-Path: <address@hidden>
  X-Original-To: address@hidden
  Delivered-To: address@hidden
  X-policyd-weight: using cached result; rate:hard: -8.5
  Received: from ( [])
          by (Acme Bit-Twister) with ESMTP id 6804D6029A
          for <address@hidden>; Mon, 30 Apr 2012 19:24:24 +0200 (CEST)
  Received: from Debian-debbugs by with local (Exim 4.72)
          (envelope-from <address@hidden>)
          id 1SOFjK-0001ZZ-6k
          for address@hidden; Sat, 28 Apr 2012 18:03:02 -0400
  Content-Disposition: inline
  Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
  MIME-Version: 1.0
  X-Mailer: MIME-tools 5.428 (Entity 5.428)
  Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
  X-Loop: address@hidden
  From: address@hidden (GNU bug Tracking System)
  To: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
  Subject: bug#11374: Acknowledgement (emacsclient: avoid invalid strcpy
   upon partial send and buffer overrun upon failed send.)
  Message-ID: <address@hidden>
  References: <address@hidden>
  X-Gnu-PR-Message: ack 11374
  X-Gnu-PR-Package: emacs
  Reply-To: address@hidden
  Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2012 22:03:02 +0000

  Thank you for filing a new bug report with

  This is an automatically generated reply to let you know your message
  has been received.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]