[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [OT] Help with bisonc++(1)
|
From: |
Kip Warner |
|
Subject: |
Re: [OT] Help with bisonc++(1) |
|
Date: |
Tue, 01 Aug 2017 08:57:21 -0700 |
On Tue, 2017-08-01 at 10:48 +0200, Hans Åberg wrote:
> Your base class copy constructor is marked delete:
Yes, it needs to stay deleted (intentional). But if the derived class's
copy constructor explicitly calls the base class's default constructor
in the initialization list, it compiles without warning. I'm assuming
upstream might not have been using gcc, or at least another version of
it, because gcc expects it in the initialization list. Thanks for your
tips Hans.
--
Kip Warner | Senior Software Engineer
OpenPGP signed/encrypted mail preferred
http://www.thevertigo.com
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part