[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?
|
From: |
Hans Aberg |
|
Subject: |
Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:00:40 +0100 |
[Please cc the list.]
On 18 Dec 2013, at 11:05, John P. Hartmann <address@hidden> wrote:
> Isn't the grammar context sensitive? No way that can be shoehorned into
> LALR(1).
Computer languages are typically context sensitive, but that is pushed into the
actions.
Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Akim Demaille, 2013/12/22
- Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Adam Smalin, 2013/12/22
- Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Adam Smalin, 2013/12/22
- Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Akim Demaille, 2013/12/22
- Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Akim Demaille, 2013/12/22
- Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Adam Smalin, 2013/12/22
- Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Akim Demaille, 2013/12/23
- Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Adam Smalin, 2013/12/23
- Re: Tell a rule to shift instead of reduce?, Akim Demaille, 2013/12/24