Re: Parser base class (lalr1)

[Hans Aberg]

On 28 Sep 2005, at 21:02, Jan Nabbefeld wrote:

> > > I know lalr1.cc skeleton is experimantal and not supported so I
> > > don't complain about that. Would be nice to have the possibility
> > > again without customize the skeleton.
> > When Akim has finished the writing of %define, customizing will be
> > easy.
>
> Whats the plan? Can you give some details? The idea of defining code
> snippets via the %defines statements sounds good and was nicely
> implemented by %define root ... (at least for me ;-)).

The details will be available, I gather, when the implementation has  
been done. :-)

It is just a .y command on some form perhaps like
  %define <macro_name> {<definition>}
One then just puts the macro name corresponding to <macro_name> in  
the skeleton file where the code should be put. It already exists,  
but can now only place a string with no '\n', so it is not really  
useful for code placement.

  Hans Aberg