[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Health-i18n] Proposal in health ICD10-PCS template file
From: |
Luis Falcon |
Subject: |
Re: [Health-i18n] Proposal in health ICD10-PCS template file |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Jan 2016 19:12:24 +0000 |
Hi all !
On Wed, 6 Jan 2016 20:26:48 +0000
Luis Falcon <address@hidden> wrote:
> Dear translators
>
> We're making good advances on the new Pootle server, thanks especially
> to Ineiev ! :)
>
> I would like to propose the removal of the template file for the
> ICD10-PCS (Procedure Coding System) module[1]. This module is *huge*
> (approx 670000 words) and today its use is pretty much limited to the
> United States, which already uses English.
>
> During all these years, nobody has worked on its translation,
> which tells me that its usage outside the US, non-English speaking
> languages is quite limited.
>
> If we keep it, nothing happens, but the translation completion level
> would look Of course, the POT file is already on the template tarball
> that I've sent before, so we can always translate it.
>
> For example, if we look at languages such as Japanese, which is about
> 95% translated, when we add the ICD10-PCS module, the completion level
> drops down to 11% :)
>
> Let me know your thoughts.
>
The template from ICD10-PCS has been removed from Mercurial, so it
won't affect the statistics.
Those of you interested in translating it can find the file in the
template tarball.
Bests,
> Bests,
>
> 1.- https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ICD-10_Procedure_Coding_System
>
>