[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again
From: |
Matti Katila |
Subject: |
Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again |
Date: |
Mon, 12 May 2003 15:14:00 +0300 (EEST) |
On Mon, 12 May 2003, Tuomas Lukka wrote:
> Overall changes
> ---------------
>
> Create new package, ``org.fenfire.vocab.lava``.
>
> Move most of the vocabulary entries into lava.
>
> Freeze ``org.fenfire.vocab``. Changes only through PEG process.
>
> Change the prefix ``http://fenfire.org/vocabulary/``
> to ``http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/``.
> After the prefix, each namespace shall contain the year and month it was
> originally
> defined in, in the form
> ``2003/05/``. After that, the name of the namespace, lowercase, with .html
> -suffix.
> So, for instance, FF.content would be
> ``http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/2003/05/fenfire.html#content``.
And then we need a script which takes care to link every vocabulary
to http://fenfire.org/rdf-v/?
> ALPH
> """"
>
> Remove ``content``, is in FF.
>
> Remove ``clone`` and ``cloneType`` and ``dataType``,
> not current/relevant.
>
> Remove ``xuType``, should be ``xuLinkType``.
>
> Then, we have left ``xuLinkFrom``, ``xuLinkTo``, ``xuLinkType``.
> We should probably avoid 'xu' in the permanent names,
> just in case. These should be moved to CLINK.CLink, CLINK.cLinkFrom,
> CLINK.cLinkTo for clink, "content link", a term Ted at some point used.
I think you got lost with your definitions :)
CLINK.to and CLINK.from
or
CLINK.left and CLINK.rigth
And what we want to say with
/** ,--ALPH:xuLinkFrom -> enfilade
* ALPH.xuType <--RDF:type --- id--<
* '--ALPH:xuLinkTo-> enfilade
*/
It's like CLINK.Pair or CLINK.Nut (or something related to fen .)
or CLINK.container.
But it's not CLINK.CLink - this is not a programming language.
> FF
> ""
>
> Retain. Javadocs::
> static public Object content;
Should be final?
> Combine to one class, CANVAS2D.
> Rename ``Canvas`` to ``Canvas2D``.
Again, 'CANVAS2D.Canvas2D' ugh..
CANVAS2D.Canvas tells a lot more than CANVAS2D.Canvas2D.
At least to me the latter one leaves a question: "And that means?"
> PP
> ""
>
> Remove everything except association. Move association to DLINK.
What? Content link and dynamic link? Hmm, yes, because clink can also mean
constant link ;)
> Name comes from "Directed LINK".
Ou.. that was not the first thing in mind.
> Javadoc::
> /** RDF vocabulary for directed (so far typeless)
> * one-to-one links.
> */
> public class DLINK {
> /** The directed link association.
> * A and B are linked by the tuple (A, DLINK.dLink, B)
> */
> static public Object dLink;
> }
Hmm, 'DLINK.dlink' - Are you sure?-)
Don't take this personally but it's little funny :)
> RDF
> """
>
> Leave as is, javadoc properly. Javadoc::
But it has only a 'type'. Do we want to say in public that we need only
type of the RDF related vocabs?-)
-Matti
- [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Tuomas Lukka, 2003/05/12
- Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again, Benja Fallenstein, 2003/05/12
Re: [Gzz] PEG: vocab again,
Matti Katila <=