[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst
From: |
Janne V. Kujala |
Subject: |
[Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst |
Date: |
Wed, 14 May 2003 05:22:24 -0400 |
CVSROOT: /cvsroot/fenfire
Module name: journals
Changes by: Janne V. Kujala <address@hidden> 03/05/14 05:22:24
Modified files:
plans : SA_2003.rst
Log message:
reorg
CVSWeb URLs:
http://savannah.gnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/fenfire/journals/plans/SA_2003.rst.diff?tr1=1.114&tr2=1.115&r1=text&r2=text
Patches:
Index: journals/plans/SA_2003.rst
diff -u journals/plans/SA_2003.rst:1.114 journals/plans/SA_2003.rst:1.115
--- journals/plans/SA_2003.rst:1.114 Wed May 14 05:14:13 2003
+++ journals/plans/SA_2003.rst Wed May 14 05:22:23 2003
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
Solutions for certain number-conserving deterministic cellular automata.
*Physical Review E* 65, 026115, 2002.
The simple cellular automaton
- rules introduced in [JVKXXXFUCHSBOCCARAREF] produced an unexpected
result in simulations.
+ rules introduced in [fuksboccara-generalized]_ produced an unexpected
result in simulations.
We were able to solve the problem exactly starting from first principles,
by using generating functions in a rather twisted way.
@@ -280,11 +280,82 @@
Objectives and methods
======================
-(reorg: "general (user experiments, math. modeling)", then specific projects,
- stating for each the objectives *and* methods.)
+Research methods in general
+---------------------------
-Objectives of the research
---------------------------
+Mathematical modeling
+'''''''''''''''''''''
+
+JVK, HH
+
+For text filtering and ...
+
+As one theoretical approach for modeling the readability
+we can use the correlation function of the rendered text.
+
+In this approach, we can apply the earlier experience
+on the MCMC and other sampling and modeling methods.
+
+Usability experiments
+'''''''''''''''''''''
+
+JVK, HH
+
+Most of the new user interface tehcnologies are based on
+modeling properties of human visual perception and cognition.
+
+One of the basic principles of the Fenfire user interfaces is continuity.
+Continuity helps the user to perceive the interface as cognitively
+coherent --- things are related to each other, not disconnected. This
+reduces load in the user's working memory.
+
+Some of the ideas aiming to maintain continuity in the Fenfire user
+interface (such as focus-context) have been proved to be efficient by
+earlier researchers. Several ideas presented here are, however, genuinely
+new and thus need to be subjected to rigor experimenting and testing. We
+plan to test the usability of the ideas first in basic cognitive tasks
+before implementing and testing them in a larger context.
+
+The first-phase experiments include tasks varying from very simple
+perceptual tasks (such as visual search and recognition) to more complex
+problem-solving tasks. The experiments will be conducted with about ten
+naïve participants per experiment. The data will include response times
+and error rates of the participants. In addition, surveys or short
+interviews can be used to collect the personal opinions of the
+participants about the tested idea.
+
+For example, fillets are designed to enhance perceivability of visual
+connections between interface elements. Fillets have been tested in a
+controlled experiment, showing that fillets do facilitate recognizing
+certain visual structures in a collection of visual items and their
+interconnections, compared to more common implementations. In the next
+phase, fillets will be tested in a more realistic situation requiring the
+user to trace visual connections between information items.
+
+Textured backgrounds implement continuity by providing unique, permanent
+visual context for interface elements to facilitate search and recognition
+of the elements in prolonged use. Textures will be tested to show that the
+user can implicitly memorize textures during interaction with the
+interface elements and use this information to recognize the elements
+faster and more accurately. We will also conduct readibility tests on
+textures to show that a textured background of text does not necessarily
+impair either the legibility or the readability of the text.
+
+Finally, we will carry usability tests on a simulated interface, in which
+several ideas are implemented simultaneously. The users will be observed
+in realistic use situations. Behavioral data will be gathered in verbal
+protocols, videotaping, and surveys.
+
+.. - fillets more general testing
+ - paper distributions (color, etc.)
+ - irregu?
+ - controllers
+ - "stress-testing"?
+
+
+
+Objectives, hypotheses, and methods per sub-project
+---------------------------------------------------
Because of the nature of this project, there are a num
@@ -528,79 +599,6 @@
Flexible focus+context views such as fisheye distortions
allow more context to be shown but also induce
usability issues that need to be solved.
-
-
-Hypotheses and research methods
--------------------------------
-
-Mathematical modeling
-'''''''''''''''''''''
-
-JVK, HH
-
-For text filtering and ...
-
-As one theoretical approach for modeling the readability
-we can use the correlation function of the rendered text.
-
-In this approach, we can apply the earlier experience
-on the MCMC and other sampling and modeling methods.
-
-Usability experiments
-'''''''''''''''''''''
-
-JVK, HH
-
-Most of the new user interface tehcnologies are based on
-modeling properties of human visual perception and cognition.
-
-One of the basic principles of the Fenfire user interfaces is continuity.
-Continuity helps the user to perceive the interface as cognitively
-coherent --- things are related to each other, not disconnected. This
-reduces load in the user's working memory.
-
-Some of the ideas aiming to maintain continuity in the Fenfire user
-interface (such as focus-context) have been proved to be efficient by
-earlier researchers. Several ideas presented here are, however, genuinely
-new and thus need to be subjected to rigor experimenting and testing. We
-plan to test the usability of the ideas first in basic cognitive tasks
-before implementing and testing them in a larger context.
-
-The first-phase experiments include tasks varying from very simple
-perceptual tasks (such as visual search and recognition) to more complex
-problem-solving tasks. The experiments will be conducted with about ten
-naïve participants per experiment. The data will include response times
-and error rates of the participants. In addition, surveys or short
-interviews can be used to collect the personal opinions of the
-participants about the tested idea.
-
-For example, fillets are designed to enhance perceivability of visual
-connections between interface elements. Fillets have been tested in a
-controlled experiment, showing that fillets do facilitate recognizing
-certain visual structures in a collection of visual items and their
-interconnections, compared to more common implementations. In the next
-phase, fillets will be tested in a more realistic situation requiring the
-user to trace visual connections between information items.
-
-Textured backgrounds implement continuity by providing unique, permanent
-visual context for interface elements to facilitate search and recognition
-of the elements in prolonged use. Textures will be tested to show that the
-user can implicitly memorize textures during interaction with the
-interface elements and use this information to recognize the elements
-faster and more accurately. We will also conduct readibility tests on
-textures to show that a textured background of text does not necessarily
-impair either the legibility or the readability of the text.
-
-Finally, we will carry usability tests on a simulated interface, in which
-several ideas are implemented simultaneously. The users will be observed
-in realistic use situations. Behavioral data will be gathered in verbal
-protocols, videotaping, and surveys.
-
-.. - fillets more general testing
- - paper distributions (color, etc.)
- - irregu?
- - controllers
- - "stress-testing"?
Research schedule
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, (continued)
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/13
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/05/13
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/05/13
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Hermanni Hyytiälä, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Hermanni Hyytiälä, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Hermanni Hyytiälä, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst,
Janne V. Kujala <=
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Hermanni Hyytiälä, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Janne V. Kujala, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Tuomas J. Lukka, 2003/05/14
- [Gzz-commits] journals/plans SA_2003.rst, Hermanni Hyytiälä, 2003/05/14