[bug#34079] [PATCH] sshfs rename (Was: Re: Proposal: rename sshfs-fuse -> sshfs)

[swedebugia]

Leo Famulari <address@hidden> writes:

> On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 12:41:59PM +0100, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
>> I have no objections to renaming the package, though you’ll need to keep
>> a definition for “sshfs-fuse” to indicate to users that the package has
>> been renamed.
>
> Right. See the definition of 'letsencrypt' in (gnu packages tls) for an
> example of this.

Done.

>From 86536694d40eb42e746b55cac5caa98e28946ed1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: swedebugia <address@hidden>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2019 21:03:20 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Rename sshfs-fuse to sshfs.

* gnu/packages/linux.scm
  (sshfs-fuse): Mark as superseeded.
  (sshfs): New variable.
---
 gnu/packages/linux.scm | 9 +++++++--
 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gnu/packages/linux.scm b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
index 4fb85f2f3..4b70694d2 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/linux.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/linux.scm
@@ -1810,9 +1810,9 @@ UnionFS-FUSE additionally supports copy-on-write.")
                #t))))))
     (inputs `(("fuse" ,fuse-static)))))
 
-(define-public sshfs-fuse
+(define-public sshfs
   (package
-    (name "sshfs-fuse")
+    (name "sshfs")
     (version "2.10")
     (source (origin
               (method url-fetch)
@@ -1837,6 +1837,11 @@ up: on the server side there's nothing to do; on the 
client side mounting the
 file system is as easy as logging into the server with an SSH client.")
     (license license:gpl2+)))
 
+(define-public sshfs-fuse
+  (package (inherit sshfs)
+    (name "sshfs-fuse")
+    (properties `((superseded . ,sshfs)))))
+
 (define-public archivemount
   (package
     (name "archivemount")
-- 
2.19.2