[bug#34056] [PATCH] core-updates -- gnu: python2: Fix test flags.

[Efraim Flashner]

On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 10:23:20AM -0600, Eric Bavier wrote:
> On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 09:48:59 +0200
> Efraim Flashner <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 01:18:49AM -0600, address@hidden wrote:
> > > From: Eric Bavier <address@hidden>
> > > 
> > > * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-2.7)[arguments]: 'EXTRATESTOPTS' ->
> > > 'TESTOPTS'.  This overrides the default '-l' argument for memory leak 
> > > checks
> > > which is not compatible with the -j for parallelism.
> > > ---
> > >  gnu/packages/python.scm | 2 +-
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > 
> > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
> > > index 9b43f465cc..dffded738d 100644
> > > --- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
> > > +++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
> > > @@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
> > >                              (assoc-ref %outputs "out") "/lib"))
> > >         ;; With no -j argument tests use all available cpus, so provide 
> > > one.
> > >         #:make-flags
> > > -       (list (format #f "EXTRATESTOPTS=-j~d" (parallel-job-count)))
> > > +       (list (format #f "TESTOPTS=-j~d" (parallel-job-count)))
> > >  
> > >          #:modules ((ice-9 ftw) (ice-9 match)
> > >                     (guix build utils) (guix build gnu-build-system))
> > > -- 
> > > 2.20.1
> > >   
> > 
> > I'm building out python2 now on my aarch64 board but I assume it'll
> > work. While I do prefer the parallelism in the test suite, between the
> > two I'd consider the memory leak checks the more important of the two.
> > 
> 
> Are the memory-leak checks something that we need to worry about in our
> packaging of python2?  Can memory leaks be introduced in the way we
> configure and build our python?  Otherwise I assume that's something
> more interesting to someone developing python itself and not as
> interesting in system CI.  IMHO.

No idea.

> I see I should probably move the comment about this overriding -l from
> the commit message to the code comment.
> 

Sounds like a good idea :)


-- 
Efraim Flashner   <address@hidden>   אפרים פלשנר
GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D  14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351
Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted

signature.asc
Description: PGP signature