[bug#33598] Optimizations for emacs-clang-format and emacs-clang-rename

[Tim Gesthuizen]

On 19.12.2018 18:50, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Hi Tim,
> 
> Yeah, that makes sense.  Please send a new patch updated with the 
> aforementioned
> recommendations and I'll merge.
> Thanks for the good work!
> 

Hi,
I had some problems packaging the changes because I had some really
weird issues with the guile modules (please validate that the patches
compile as expected).
They implement the discussed function for generating package definitions
for packages that contain only a single elisp file from another packages
source.
If the attached patches compile, they can be merged and work as
expected. If they cause weird errors to happen Pierre tries to find some
time to investigate into this.

Tim Gesthuizen.

0001-gnu-Shrink-source-for-emacs-clang-format.patch
Description: Text Data

0002-gnu-Shrink-source-for-emacs-clang-rename.patch
Description: Text Data

0003-gnu-Add-package-from-clang-elisp-file.patch
Description: Text Data

0004-gnu-Add-package-elisp-from-package.patch
Description: Text Data

0005-gnu-Use-package-elisp-from-package-for-clangs-emacs-.patch
Description: Text Data

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature