guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#33099] [PATCH] I add r-aspi package appended to cran.scm file


From: Gábor Boskovits
Subject: [bug#33099] [PATCH] I add r-aspi package appended to cran.scm file
Date: Mon, 22 Oct 2018 15:39:18 +0200

Hi Laura,

Laura Lazzati <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2018.
okt. 22., H, 14:59):
>
> On Mon, 22 Oct 2018, 05:47 Gábor Boskovits, <address@hidden> wrote:
> >
> > Hello Laura,
> >
> > Almost there!
>
> Yes, after trying lots of things I figured out why it took me so long
> to package it. The short story is that I did not understand that guix
> import cran -r aspi was creating the template for me, I thought it
> worked only for packages that were already packeged.I applied it to
> another r package already available in guix, and modified it with
> information about aspi from its website. The good side is that I
> learned tons of guix commands.
> >
> >
> > Laura Lazzati <address@hidden> ezt írta (időpont: 2018.
> > okt. 21., V, 23:54):
> > >
> > > From 3628e4d7d4814777bb748c3f0ebba133814b2b94 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > > From: laura <address@hidden>
> > > Date: Sun, 21 Oct 2018 18:38:58 -0300
> > > Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add r-aspi
> > >
> > > * gnu/packages/cran.scm (r-aspi): New variable
> > > ---
> > >  gnu/packages/cran.scm | 21 +++++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+)
> > >
> >
> > Just a bit knitpicking, could you add the periods to the commit message, 
> > like:
> >
> > gnu: Add r-aspi.
> >
> > * gnu/packages/patches/cran.scm (r-aspi): New variable.
> >
> >
> > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/cran.scm b/gnu/packages/cran.scm
> > > index efcc2dccb..c219065e8 100644
> > > --- a/gnu/packages/cran.scm
> > > +++ b/gnu/packages/cran.scm
> > > @@ -6256,3 +6256,24 @@ a header row or not.  The dataset should
> > > contain only one independent variable
> > >  (x) and one dependent variable (y) and can contain a weight for each
> > >  observation.")
> > >      (license license:gpl2)))
> > > +
> > > +(define-public r-aspi
> > > +  (package
> > > +    (name "r-aspi")
> > > +    (version "0.2.0")
> > > +    (source
> > > +      (origin
> > > +        (method url-fetch)
> > > +        (uri (cran-uri "aspi" version))
> > > +        (sha256
> > > +          (base32
> > > +            "0rhvxw243vvdv3hxa6pi343gcjc2cbxq1jzqirl9k1l4i3897l87"))))
> > > +    (build-system r-build-system)
> > > +    (home-page
> > > +      "http://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/aspi";)
> > > +    (synopsis
> > > +      "Analysis of symmetry of parasitic infections")
> > > +    (description
> > > +      "This package provides tools for the analysis and visualization
> > > of bilateral
> > > + asymmetry in parasitic infections.")
> > > +    (license license:gpl3+)))
> > > --
> > > 2.17.1
> > >
> >
> > This is fine now.
> >
> > I still see these strange line breaks in the patch, how does that look on
> > you side?
>
> I guess the problem was that I was adding a line break because in the
> previous patch when building I had a complain that that line was too
> long. I have just told emacs to truncate long lines and buld the
> package without problems. My fault. It was one of the two changes that
> I made from the original definiton. Adding that break line and adding
> licence: before gpl3+ because otherwhise  I got the error: Unbound
> variable: gpl3+.
> >
> >
> > Can you apply you own patches using git am?
> In my local repo?
> >
> > You can send an updated patch with the corrected commit message,
> > or I can apply these minor changes and push it.
> > WDYT?
> If it is not a problem for you, let me try :)
> Do you mean by changing the subject of this chain of messages?

Yes, that would do half the job.

There is also a missing period in this line:
* gnu/packages/cran.scm (r-aspi): New variable

You can either fix these up manually, or using
git commit --amend, and fix these in the commit message.
That way git format-patch will fix these up.

> Is that
> OK for sending the patch with the corrections, but keeping the
> debugs.gnu.org mail with the number as it is in the To field?

Yes that is fine.

> >
> > Best regards,
> > g_bor
>
> Regards :)
> Laura

Best regards,
g_bor





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]