guix-patches
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[bug#28004] Chromium


From: ng0
Subject: [bug#28004] Chromium
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2018 21:57:17 +0000

Björn Höfling transcribed 4.0K bytes:
> Hi Marius,
> 
> On Mon, 26 Feb 2018 21:06:57 +0100
> Marius Bakke <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
> > ng0 <address@hidden> writes:
> > 
> > > Marius Bakke transcribed 2.1K bytes:  
> > >> Mike Gerwitz <address@hidden> writes:
> > >>   
> > >> > On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 20:01:34 +0100, Marius Bakke wrote:  
> > >> >> If there are no objections, expect to see this in 'master' in
> > >> >> 1-2 weeks.  
> > >> >
> > >> > I want to express gratitude for your hard work on this---given
> > >> > that IceCat does not contain many of the FF devtool updates,
> > >> > Chromium is very desirable for web development.  It's also
> > >> > needed for certain Node.js tools, like node-inspector.
> > >> >
> > >> > So, thank you!  
> > >> 
> > >> Thank *you* for the kind words! :-)
> > >> 
> > >> Here is the latest iteration of this patch.  New in this version:
> > >> 
> > >> * Chromium 64 (duh).
> > >> * The 'delete-bundled-software' phase has been moved to a snippet,
> > >>   shaving ~100MiB (~22%) off the compressed tarball size (and
> > >>   drastically reduces (de)compression time).
> > >> * The New Tab page does not show any thumbnails for new profiles.  
> > >
> > > I think you forgot to attach the patches :)  
> > 
> > Derp.  I realized that and just used `git send-email`[0], but have
> > attached it here for convenience since the debbugs web UI doesn't
> > allow easy download of a raw message.
> > 
> > [0] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?msg=131;bug=28004#131
> > 
> 
> 
> This looks like a lot of work. Thank you!
> 
> I quickly tried to apply and build the patch and have two first remarks:
> 
> The file says:
> 
> ;;; Copyright © 2016, 2017, 2018 Marius Bakke <address@hidden>
> 
> I haven't followed history, have you worked on this since 2016?

Marius, myself (and others?) have been working on this at least since October 
2017.
I did a search, and indeed: Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2016 07:39:10 +0000 ... this is 
when I
first send the original Inox WIP. Wow.

> One patch has a hash-mismatch:
> 
> Starting download of 
> /gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch
> From 
> https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-chromium/pkg-chromium.git/plain/debian/patches/system/icu.patch?id=debian/64.0.3282.119-2...
>  icu.patch  2KiB                    1.8MiB/s 00:00 [####################] 
> 100.0%
> output path `/gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch' 
> should have sha256 hash 
> `0kf77d8lyma3w0xpgfv2k0c741zp6ii08gzllfja6d5s59c15ylv', instead has 
> `19r0bpv2hapzq5m0m7rlz1dwn3h2ijgkilb2hmhw56qvwpbw0b59'
> @ build-failed 
> /gnu/store/cqdllqn8ig5wnjn0yqvnh4vlzsvnpzv6-chromium-icu.patch.drv - 1 output 
> path `/gnu/store/q8hlws48cjfcmz6i40jrnxn3kp750gy4-chromium-icu.patch' should 
> have sha256 hash `0kf77d8lyma3w0xpgfv2k0c741zp6ii08gzllfja6d5s59c15ylv', 
> instead has `19r0bpv2hapzq5m0m7rlz1dwn3h2ijgkilb2hmhw56qvwpbw0b59'
> cannot build derivation 
> `/gnu/store/vacxbwsprcp52vp6q975450zi091dak2-chromium-64.0.3282.186.tar.xz.drv':
>  1 dependencies couldn't be built
> @ build-started 
> /gnu/store/7q53inn1v32b5fain0h0wcrliclf0ff1-libvpx+experimental-1.7.0.drv - 
> x86_64-linux 
> /var/log/guix/drvs/7q//53inn1v32b5fain0h0wcrliclf0ff1-libvpx+experimental-1.7.0.drv.bz2
> cannot build derivation 
> `/gnu/store/5qv7anaaqk4576pma9mhcsz1nhrx1n01-chromium-64.0.3282.186.drv': 1 
> dependencies couldn't be built
> guix build: error: build failed: build of 
> `/gnu/store/5qv7anaaqk4576pma9mhcsz1nhrx1n01-chromium-64.0.3282.186.drv' 
> failed
> 
> I looked into the file and it looks reasonable, like a patch-file. It has no 
> download errors.
> 
> It starts like this:
> 
> description: backwards compatibility for older versions of icu
> author: Michael Gilbert <address@hidden>
> 
> --- a/v8/src/runtime/runtime-intl.cc
> +++ b/v8/src/runtime/runtime-intl.cc
> @@ -627,7 +627,11 @@ RUNTIME_FUNCTION(Runtime_PluralRulesSele
> 
> ...
> 
> Can you check this file again?

With the patch Marius send yesterday it works for me.

> Björn
> 
> 



-- 
A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
https://n0.is

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]