[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede.
From: |
ng0 |
Subject: |
[bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede. |
Date: |
Thu, 4 Jan 2018 19:22:53 +0000 |
Leo Famulari transcribed 1.6K bytes:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 03:54:28PM +0100, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
> > Leo,
> >
> > Leo Famulari wrote on 04/01/18 at 03:59:
> > >> While our Newsbeuter shouldn't be outright vulnerable (thanks to Leo and
> > >> Efraim), and newsbeuter.org might be only temporarily off-line, what do
> > >> we think about blessing its successor? Surely it's but a one-line patch.
> > >
> > > I think it's a good idea!
> >
> > Good to hear! Any chance there's a less silly way to make the change?
>
> I'm not sure what's silly about it? Is there something that requires the
> package definition to be moved?
Can't we use the package property superseded? That's how I imagined
'superseded' would work.
What you are doing is dropping it as far as I remember the first email.
--
GnuPG: A88C8ADD129828D7EAC02E52E22F9BBFEE348588
GnuPG: https://c.n0.is/ng0_pubkeys/tree/keys
WWW: https://n0.is/a/ :: https://ea.n0.is
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/01/03
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., Leo Famulari, 2018/01/03
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/01/04
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., Leo Famulari, 2018/01/04
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede.,
ng0 <=
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., ng0, 2018/01/04
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/01/04
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., Ludovic Courtès, 2018/01/07
- [bug#29973] [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/01/08
bug#29973: [PATCH] gnu: newsbeuter: Supersede., Tobias Geerinckx-Rice, 2018/01/10