[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?
From: |
Giovanni Biscuolo |
Subject: |
Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what? |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jan 2019 11:39:35 +0100 |
Ricardo,
Ricardo Wurmus <address@hidden> writes:
> Giovanni Biscuolo <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> IMHO it should be explicitly stated that in general it's not
>> advised/needed to install guix for the root user and that "guix system"
>> must be run as a normal user via sudo (and the user must be allowed to
>> do so by root via sudoers); then the example above
>
> Currently, installing Guix for the root user is what the installer
> script does and what the instructions for the binary installation method
> suggest.
mumble: yes mine was a stupid statement, I should have read that twice :-S
Thanks!
Giovanni
[...]
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, (continued)
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2019/01/18
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Ricardo Wurmus, 2019/01/18
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Caleb Ristvedt, 2019/01/18
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Giovanni Biscuolo, 2019/01/18
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Caleb Ristvedt, 2019/01/18
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Danny Milosavljevic, 2019/01/18
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, swedebugia, 2019/01/19
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/01/19
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Ludovic Courtès, 2019/01/19
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?, Danny Milosavljevic, 2019/01/19
- Re: ‘sudo’ leaves PATH unchanged… so what?,
Giovanni Biscuolo <=