Re: Octave & QtOctave

[swedebugia]

On 2018-11-28 11:47, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Kei Kebreau <address@hidden> skribis:
snip

> > I agree with ng0 that Octave and its GUI interface should be kept in
> > separate packages, as the difference in size is more than 5000 MiB.
> > I also agree that the GUI package should be named "octave", but I don't
> > know whether the CLI package should be named "octave-minimal" or
> > "octave-cli".  I find myself leaning toward "octave-cli" because the CLI
> > package does include some non-essential dependencies.
>
> Makes sense to me.  If others agree with this (“octave-cli” rather than
> “octave-minimal”), go ahead!

I agree.

--
Cheers
Swedebugia