[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NPM importer
From: |
Giovanni Biscuolo |
Subject: |
Re: NPM importer |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:37:40 +0100 |
address@hidden (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
> Yes, this was the topic of a GSoC project by Jelle Licht (Cc’d). But
> don’t hold your breath: as Chris Webber explained, the npm situation is
> very hard to address sanely:
>
> http://dustycloud.org/blog/javascript-packaging-dystopia/
(semi OT: today Debian ships a recent jquery 3.2.1)
I'm not an expert in js (nor guix) packaging so I'm not able to judge
this:
https://spin.atomicobject.com/2016/12/16/reproducible-builds-npm-yarn/
is yarn a viable solution to the NPM packaging problems?
can we achieve reproducible builds ala guix with a yarn importer and
some amount of yarn packages downloading/automation and offline
mirroring?
Ciao
Giovanni
P.S.: why
--
Giovanni Biscuolo
Xelera IT Infrastructures
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: NPM importer, (continued)
- Re: NPM importer, Julien Lepiller, 2018/11/22
- Re: NPM importer, swedebugia, 2018/11/24
- Re: NPM importer, swedebugia, 2018/11/23
- Re: NPM importer, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/11/30
- Re: NPM importer, swedebugia, 2018/11/24
Re: NPM importer, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/11/11
- Re: NPM importer,
Giovanni Biscuolo <=