[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11? |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2018 12:33:09 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Mon, Nov 12, 2018 at 10:45:07AM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> Alright, I've applied the changes and updated to go-1.11.
> Should we remove go-1.9 now?
If all of our Go packages are still working with Go 1.11, then it should
be safe to remove Go 1.9.
We should take care to handle the inheritance of Go 1.11 on Go 1.9 on Go
1.4 correctly. Unfortunately it's a bit tangled...
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, (continued)
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/12
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?,
Leo Famulari <=