[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?
From: |
Leo Famulari |
Subject: |
Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11? |
Date: |
Tue, 6 Nov 2018 14:57:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) |
On Tue, Nov 06, 2018 at 06:33:53PM +0100, Pierre Neidhardt wrote:
> > If most of the Go packages are ready for Go 1.11, we could make it the
> > dfeault and then use Go 1.9 for the packages that are lagging behind. Or
> > vice versa.
>
> How do you do that?
The default Go is defined in ((guix build-system go) default-go).
Updates can be tested with this diff:
diff --git a/guix/build-system/go.scm b/guix/build-system/go.scm
index cf9116327..80894677f 100644
--- a/guix/build-system/go.scm
+++ b/guix/build-system/go.scm
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
(define (default-go)
;; Lazily resolve the binding to avoid a circular dependency.
(let ((go (resolve-interface '(gnu packages golang))))
- (module-ref go 'go)))
+ (module-ref go 'go-1.11)))
(define* (lower name
#:key source inputs native-inputs outputs system target
And individual packages can be made to use non-default Go compilers with
the #:go key, like this:
diff --git a/gnu/packages/curl.scm b/gnu/packages/curl.scm
index 2fb87251f..4c8c83d84 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/curl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/curl.scm
@@ -171,6 +171,7 @@ tunneling, and so on.")
(arguments
`(#:import-path "gitlab.com/davidjpeacock/kurly"
#:install-source? #f
+ #:go ,go-1.11
#:phases
(modify-phases %standard-phases
(add-after 'install 'install-documentation
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/06
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?,
Leo Famulari <=
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Leo Famulari, 2018/11/07
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11
- Re: Packaging gx (for IPFS): Need to update default Go to 1.11?, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/11/11