[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lisp libraries: Other variants? (CCL, CLisp, etc.)
From: |
Pierre Neidhardt |
Subject: |
Re: Lisp libraries: Other variants? (CCL, CLisp, etc.) |
Date: |
Mon, 05 Nov 2018 22:03:35 +0100 |
User-agent: |
mu4e 1.0; emacs 26.1 |
Hi again!
Thanks for your proposal, it brings up some interesting ideas.
Have you looked at lisp-utils.scm? I think it incorporates some of your ideas
already. It could perhaps be generalized following your ideas so that it works
for all Lisps out of the box.
Question: Are .fasl files compatible across Common Lisp implementations? If
not, then what's your suggestion?
I have a few more questions:
> The idea is simpler packaging, through a system called PACKAGER, which would
> provide a very
> high-level and exhaustive declaration of an entire Common Lisp package or
> collection of packages
By "system", do you mean a _build system_ or something else?
> This location could default to "~/.common-lisp/" and be controlled through an
> environmental
> variable, with a name such as GUIX_COMMON_LISP_HOME.
We want to install libraries in the store. Why do you suggest we put it in the
user's home?
> As the files actually loaded by this system
> proposed would be generated as needed and for the system, that eliminates
> this.
Sorry, I don't understand how your proposal would eliminate the POSIX-assumption
issue. Can you provide an example?
Cheers!
--
Pierre Neidhardt
https://ambrevar.xyz/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature