[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0
From: |
Nils Gillmann |
Subject: |
Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0 |
Date: |
Thu, 30 Aug 2018 15:17:12 +0000 |
Tobias Geerinckx-Rice transcribed 340 bytes:
> Guix,
>
> Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> > Ludovic Courtès <address@hidden> writes:
> > > I think “Guix System” is OK.
> >
> > I think so too.
>
> Big +1.
>
> If you use 'guix system', you're using Guix System[0].
>
> It doesn't get less confusing than that.
>
> Kind regards,
>
> T G-R
>
> [0]: The only question left is 'on what?'. Everything, of course.
>
Sounds good for me too.
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, (continued)
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Ludovic Courtès, 2018/08/19
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Amirouche Boubekki, 2018/08/19
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Amirouche Boubekki, 2018/08/29
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Pierre Neidhardt, 2018/08/30
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, George Clemmer, 2018/08/30
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Gábor Boskovits, 2018/08/30
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, George Clemmer, 2018/08/31
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Vincent Legoll, 2018/08/31
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Amirouche Boubekki, 2018/08/31
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, George Clemmer, 2018/08/30
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/08/30
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2018/08/30
- Re: Roadmap for Guix 1.0, Taylan Kammer, 2018/08/30