[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3
|
From: |
Hartmut Goebel |
|
Subject: |
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3 |
|
Date: |
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 22:47:49 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.6.0 |
Am 13.03.2018 um 22:23 schrieb Ludovic Courtès:
> I may well have missed something (sorry about that!), but what are “the
> problems related to how Guix is using PYTHONPATH”?
In short:
We are using PYTHONPATH for something it is not meant for: PYTHONPATH is
NOT intended (by upstream) for adding site-packages. PYTHONPATH
elements are added in front of essential packages, while site-packages
are added behind.
Dor details please see part 1 of my analysis.
--
Regards
Hartmut Goebel
| Hartmut Goebel | address@hidden |
| www.crazy-compilers.com | compilers which you thought are impossible |
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3, Hartmut Goebel, 2018/03/13
Re: PYTHONPATH issue analysis - part 3, Ricardo Wurmus, 2018/03/14