Re: OpenBLAS and performance

[Ricardo Wurmus]

Dave Love <address@hidden> writes:

> Another point about the OB package is that it excludes LAPACK for some
> reason that doesn't seem to be recorded.  I think that should be
> included, partly for convenience, and partly because it optimizes some
> of LAPACK.

That was me, I think.  I did this because I assumed that if users want
LAPACK they’d just install the lapack package.  If this turns out to be
a misguided idea because the OB LAPACK differs then I’m fine with
enabling LAPACK in the OB package. 

(I’m not very knowlegdeable about all of this.  I just happened to
package OpenBLAS first.)

--
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6  2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https://elephly.net