[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix |
Date: |
Sun, 05 Nov 2017 16:49:01 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) |
Jan Nieuwenhuizen <address@hidden> skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> Here’s an update on reproducibility in Guix:
>>
>>
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guix/news/reproducible-builds-a-status-update.html
>
> At least 78% to possibly 91% reproduciblility of packages is not bad.
>
> Is there a (small) core that is already 100% reprocucible, like the
> installation binaries/USB installer, bare-bones.tmpl or even
> lightweight-desktop.tmpl?
Good question! I think as soon as you have Python .pyc files in the
dependency graph (reference graph), there are non-reproducible bits. We
certainly have Python stuff in the base system reference graph, so
that’s one thing we should fix most urgently I guess.
Ludo’.
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Jan Nieuwenhuizen, 2017/11/01
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix,
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Gábor Boskovits, 2017/11/05
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Hartmut Goebel, 2017/11/05
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, ng0, 2017/11/05
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Ludovic Courtès, 2017/11/06
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Hartmut Goebel, 2017/11/06
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Gábor Boskovits, 2017/11/06
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Eric Myhre, 2017/11/07
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Hartmut Goebel, 2017/11/07
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Marius Bakke, 2017/11/06
- Re: Status update on reproducible builds in Guix, Hartmut Goebel, 2017/11/07