[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release!
|
From: |
David Pirotte |
|
Subject: |
Re: Release! |
|
Date: |
Fri, 6 Oct 2017 20:31:29 -0300 |
Hi Recardo,
Hi Ludo,
> >> • Merge the potluck! <https://bugs.gnu.org/26645>
> About that… We now have a JSON importer, so maybe it’s worth using the
> even simpler JSON package format instead of the simplified S-expression
> format that Andy proposed. What do you think? Should we discuss this
> at <https://bugs.gnu.org/26645>?
FWIW, I much prefer s-exp, and the generated file is a scheme file right? I very
much doubt guix and potluck package developers can't easily read (and write :))
s-exp, so why would we 'abandon' s-exp, what would we win here? These files will
never be processed by anything else but guix and/or potluck, and the 'package
developers' do all know scheme perfectly well...
my 2c :)
Thanks for the fantastic work, both Guix and potluck!
David
pgpzVTjvNZtEE.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
[PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Mark H Weaver, 2017/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Efraim Flashner, 2017/10/07
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/08
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/08
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ricardo Wurmus, 2017/10/08
- Re: [PATCH] DRAFT: build: Compile scheme modules in batches (was Re: Release!), Ludovic Courtès, 2017/10/09