guix-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Xorg tearing fix on Intel HD Graphics 4000


From: Kei Kebreau
Subject: Re: Xorg tearing fix on Intel HD Graphics 4000
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 12:27:36 -0400
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux)

Roel Janssen <address@hidden> writes:

> Ricardo Wurmus writes:
>
>> Hi Roel,
>>
>>> With the following patch to the Xorg configuration file, I have a
>>> tear-free GuixSD experience.  I wonder if this is upstreameable in some
>>> way.  This patch is probably too broad in effect.  Can I change it so
>>> that only the graphics card I have will be affected by this patch?
>>
>> I’m not sure about this, but you can apply it only to your system by
>> changing the slim-service’s “startx” value like this:
>>
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
>>     (modify-services %desktop-services
>>       (slim-service-type
>>        config => (slim-configuration
>>                   (inherit config)
>>                   (startx (xorg-start-command
>>                            #:configuration-file
>>                            (xorg-configuration-file
>>                             #:extra-config
>>                             (list your-fix)))))))
>> --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
>>
>> But I suppose what you want is to apply it unconditionally in Guix and
>> have the X server ignore it for all but this one graphics card, right?
>
> No, not necessarily.  I could no longer do 'guix pull && guix system
> reconfigure ...', which I attempted to solve by upstreaming this patch.
>
> I wonder if anyone else is having the same problem on this hardware..  

I have the same problem on Intel GM45 graphics (in the Thinkpad
X200). I'm going to try Ricardo's snippet as well and see if things get
better.

>
> Thanks for your snippet!  I've done a system reconfigure and the extra
> configuration applied as expected.
>
> If there is anyone with the same problem, we could look further into
> upstreaming it.
>
> Thanks,
> Roel

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]