[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: updating many haskell packages
From: |
Troy Sankey |
Subject: |
Re: updating many haskell packages |
Date: |
Sun, 19 Feb 2017 14:21:58 -0500 |
User-agent: |
alot/0.4 |
Quoting Troy Sankey (2017-02-18 12:40:15)
> There is one more problem, and it is not a minor problem...
>
> ------------------------------- cut here -------------------------------
> $ du -hs tmp/all-cabal-files
> 862M tmp/all-cabal-files
> $ du -hs tmp/all-cabal-files/.git
> 140M tmp/all-cabal-files/.git
> $ echo '862 - 140' | bc
> 722
> ------------------------------- cut here -------------------------------
>
> The filesize of the package output will be 722 MiB. We could prune it
> of all the unrelated versions according to the stackage LTS, but this
> starts to get complicated and error-prone...
On second thought, this is not too much of an issue since
ghc-all-cabal-files would only be an implicit *native* input.
Bystanders who install ghc-old-time (or any other package with a revised
cabal file) from a guix substitute will not need to download
ghc-all-cabal-files.
Troy
signature.asc
Description: signature
- Re: updating many haskell packages, (continued)
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Troy Sankey, 2017/02/06
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Federico Beffa, 2017/02/06
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Troy Sankey, 2017/02/06
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Troy Sankey, 2017/02/15
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Federico Beffa, 2017/02/17
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Troy Sankey, 2017/02/17
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Federico Beffa, 2017/02/18
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Troy Sankey, 2017/02/18
- Re: updating many haskell packages, Federico Beffa, 2017/02/18
- Re: updating many haskell packages,
Troy Sankey <=